Tag Archives: Netflix

Amazon Prime…a great value for TV addicts

28 Jan

I stopped writing reviews for quite a while, partially because I was writing for Examiner.com which took up a large amount of time and paid pennies, literally.  When I wasn’t writing for Examiner.com, I was writing online lectures.  Then, when I wasn’t doing that, I was helping my friend set up a jewelry business, Chasing the Dragon Jewelry. When I wasn’t doing that, I was working on a book about writing film essays (half-way done at the moment), and finally, I was re-working two television pilots.  And getting a divorce.  It was a busy year.  Sadly, I do not have a mansion in Malibu to show for it, but there is always next year… The one thing I was doing, was watching a lot of television.  Because unlike lots of people, I do not believe that television is garbage.  Okay, I do believe some television is garbage, but I am not in the habit of watching what I define as garbage television, a definition, for now, I am keeping to myself.

Until last year, I got by on my Netflix subscription.  The problem is that I ran out of most of their British television shows that were streaming.  And I only have the two-dvds at a time plan along with the streaming, so I decided to give Amazon Prime a try.  What I liked about their deal was that not only did I get to stream a load of foreign shows in the yearly price, which is $79 per year, but I got the upgrade that allows me to order anything that falls under the prime rubric and it gets a shipping upgrade for 2nd day delivery for free.  Or, I should say, free shipping in two days time.  This has worked out well for me and I feel the membership has been worthwhile.

Amazon Prime offers a number of popular shows free for streaming such as several seasons of Californication, Downton Abbey (which I still haven’t watched, I know…I know…), Justified, The Walking Dead, Inspector Lewis, Sherlock (the British one), American Horror Story (Seasons 1 and 2), and so many children’s shows I am not even going to attempt to list them.  It also offers little gems, such as the actual Swedish version of Wallander, not the British version.  If you have not tried the Swedish version, you are missing a great show.  Over the last year, I have found that Netflix has stepped up its foreign TV game a bit and now these two offer a lot of the same shows that stream for free.

While Netflix has also gotten into the original series game, Amazon Prime is not far behind, although I will say that the Netflix product House of Cards is a far better quality product than Amazon’s Betas.  But that is only my opinion.  I am going to have to sit and watch all the original programming on Amazon Prime to give it a fair assessment.  The bottom line is that for about $8 a month, you get a lot of streaming product (I did not even bother with film but that is another consideration if film is your first love).  Right now, you can try Amazon Prime for a month for free and see if you like it.

 

Join Amazon Prime - Watch Over 40,000 Movies & TV Shows Anytime - Start Free Trial Now

Death Note: a journey from good into pure evil

16 Aug

I wasn’t sure what to expect when I first started watching the series, Death Note. It’s the first time I’ve ventured into anime and manga territory. A good friend promised I’d like it so I took the plunge and I’m glad I did, although I’ve got to say I was exhausted by the end of the series. Not in a bad way, but I felt as if I’d battled all the bad forces myself.

The TV series Death Note is based on the manga series written by Tsugumi Ohba and artist Takeshi Obata.  It begins as a simple story.  Light Yagami, a high school student discovers a notebook dropped by a god of death (known as a shinigami) on Earth.  The notebook has supernatural powers and a set of rules.  The person who finds the notebook, in this case, Light, has the power to kill anyone he wants, by picturing his victim in his mind then writing his name down in the notebook.  First, Light hesitates to use the notebook but slowly he decides it is his destiny to use the notebook for ‘good’ and to cleanse the evil from the world.  Did I mention his father is head of the police?

Light’s killing spree first is only targeted at criminals but the mysterious deaths attract international law enforcement to the case and a nemesis, L, comes into Light’s life.  By this time Light is enrolled in university and has managed to attract the interest of two different girls; one girl, his stalker, is given her own death notebook by another shinigami and she manages to get Light’s attention.  At the same time, he flirts with a successful journalism student who also likes him.  While Light has obvious psychopathic delusions of greatness, the one thing that I found upsetting was he ruthlessly used both these women who loved him.  And while I believe it could be argued that was part of the power derived from all the killing from his notebook, I would have liked to have seen a glimmer of decency in his character.

The story moves at a fast enough pace that if you are in the US and streaming it on Netflix where it is available, it will be hard to stop watching.  Watching Light go from a decent person to a deadly psychopath is at once fascinating, exciting and disheartening.  Because you realize early on, there cannot be a happy ending for Light.  In fact, you have to wonder if there can be a happy ending for anyone crossing Light’s path.  Ultimately, this story is about good turning to evil.  But more importantly, it asks the question:  what is any one person’s moral compass?  How can they seem good, been raised by a good, loving family, and have one thing happen, make the wrong choice and have their lives spiral out of control?  Because that’s what happens with Light.  Although if you asked him, he was in complete control.  He just never realized he lost it when he made the ill-fated decision of writing in the notebook and assuming a power he never should have had.  I like to think of this as a thriller that’s also a cautionary tale to anyone starting out in life, making decisions they think will only affect them, but really, they effect everyone in their lives, for better or worse.  In Light’s case, it’s much worse.  Lucky for us his spiral into evil is so entertaining.  I just wish he’d had a bit more capacity to actually love, because I think if he had, things might not have gotten so bleak for the world with him in it.

There are 37 episodes in the series.  I watched the whole thing over a week.  I’ve got to say I was sad when it ended.  And… I secretly liked the opening song, “The World”, by the 7th or 8th episode, apparently by a Japanese rock group called Nightmare .  That’s what I like about watching genres you might never try, they might surprise you and you might discover a whole new world of entertainment out there that you’d never consider.  So, I strongly recommended giving this series a try.

Revisiting Reservoir Dogs

13 Aug

Once in a while, I use a selection from Philip DeFranco‘s “Like Totally Awesome” Film Club to do a review.  Mostly because he offers three movies a week, all available for streaming on Netflix.  Sometimes these are films I’ve seen and loved.  Sometimes these are films I never bothered with.  Sometimes they’re films I hate.  And, at times like this, they are films I definitely liked but I had issues with.

Okay, I’m just going to say it.  I have issues with Quentin Tarantino.  I also have issues with other directors, probably Steven Spielberg, more so.   But I will not dissolve into a diatribe about why I dislike Spielberg’s directing in a post about Tarantino.  I will say this:  on the whole, I think Quentin Tarantino actually has some talent.  I say ‘some’ because he tends to let the fact that he’s a man get into the way of being a truly great director.  Some might say this is a harsh criticism.  I am simply saying, “Quentin, could you not be such a blatant sexist?  Especially in the opening of Reservoir Dogs?”  Because the scene in question, which I will discuss in a moment, I believe sets the tone of Tarantino’s arrogance in general.

This criticism, about being a blatant sexist probably would never have struck me so severely if if hadn’t been Tarantino’s character (played by Tarantino himself), Mr. Brown, saying the words.  It is powerful enough to have a character deliver your words, but when you as the write and director play that character and say those words, in the opening of your film, you’re delivering a message.  Maybe you don’t realize it but you are.  You’re saying, this sentiment is so important to me that I’m not letting another person say it.  I want to give the message to you, my audience.  Me!  So, I find it rather humorous (sad?  ironic?  just plain weird?) that this great message Tarantino decides to relay to us, his audience, is about the lyrics for Madonna’sLike A Virgin.”  Now the first time I listened to this opening, I was in my early 20s and didn’t pay much attention.  The subsequent times I’ve watched the film, it still didn’t strike me as anything, in fact, I almost tuned out their lyric discussion.  But this time, for the very first time, I actually listened to what he said.  All I could think was:  Is Quentin Tarantino an idiot?

In this particular scene, the opening scene, we are in a diner and a group of gangsters are finishing their meal, going through the final discussion of a heist and discussing songs.  They all have fake names, hence, Mr. Brown (Quentin Tarantino).  Mr. Brown talks on and on about what Madonna’s song really means.  Apparently, his astute analysis is that the woman in the song has had a lot of sex.  Okay, I agree with that assessment.  But here is where Mr. Tarantino and I diverge on our analysis of the song.  He claims that she feels like a virgin because her new love interest’s penis is so long that it hurts her, ‘like the first time’, hence, like a virgin.  Only there is no discussion of penis size or allusion to penises in the lyrics of the song.  Yes, I spent some time going through it.  The song is simply about a woman who is jaded who has actually fallen in love with someone and rediscovers what it is like to have feelings.  This makes me worried about Mr. Tarantino.  If he is so dense about feelings, can he not even properly interpret a simple song from the mid 1980s?  And if his ability to analyze something as straightforward as a Madonna song from her early years is impaired, what does that say about the messages he’s sending in his films?  Is he actually saying anything?  Or, is his thinking flawed?  I would say, in this instance, thank goodness this film isn’t a love story or I would have to walk out.  I know one thing, I’m going to have to re-watch True Romance now that I’ve made this discovery about his inability to understand females.  Maybe that’s why I’m always struck that the women in his films tend to be more masculine in their approach.  And no, it isn’t a bad thing if that’s the case, but I’m wondering if it is because he cannot relate to women — normally.  Or at all.  Just a thought.

Right after the lyrics debacle, one of the most famous scenes from the film appears:  the tipping of waitresses debate.  Mr. Pink (Steve Buscemi) doesn’t believe in tipping.  The rest of the guys yell at him that this is how waitresses make a living.  We suddenly get a lecture on uneducated women’s socio-economic status in the US.  I feel as if I’m being lectured at from an article in TIME magazine.  Now, suddenly, Tarantino ‘cares’ about women?  If they are in subserviant positions where they know their place and are dependent on men’s kindness?  Isn’t how they ended up in those waitress positions in the first place?  Either they or their mother’s made a bad choice?  Of course that’s not to say every waitress is from some uneducated background.  Plenty of women going to school or needing second jobs waitress.  But that isn’t the message that’s delivered in the film.  Which makes me think, before Tarantino decides to educate the audience, perhaps he needs a bit more of an education himself.

My other criticism of this film is that I don’t feel like there is anything redeeming about any of the characters.  Nothing.  And while that dislikability of characters became a somewhat popular trope with crime/violent films in the 1990s, especially the early 1990s (think The Last Seduction, 1994), I was less impressed than I felt I should have been with all the critical praise the film got at the time.  I remember going to the cinema in anticipation of greatness.  I was expecting a commercial Godard.  Instead, I just got a violent commercial with a good torture scene, some good music and, the one thing I will give Tarantino credit for, a new signature flashback/cicular narrative style.

The narrative of the film is straight forward.  There’s been a botched diamond heist.  The surviving members all suspect each other.  There are three main things that happen in the narrative after the diner scene:  Mr. Orange (Tim Roth) is shot and Mr. White (Harvey Keitel) is trying to get a doctor but these are the days before cell phones.  Mr. Pink arrives at the warehouse and essentially tells Mr. White that Mr. Orange is a liability.  Mr. Pink shouts.  A lot.  Soon Mr. Blonde (Michael Madsen) arrives and he has a surprise, a cop he’s kidnapped during the robbery.  SPOILER ALERT IF YOU HAVEN’T SEEN THE FILM.

Mr. Blonde tells Mr. White and Mr. Pink to ditch their cars.  Mr. Blonde then proceeds to torture the rookie cop he’s kidnapped in a now famous scene to the Stealer’s Wheel song “Stuck In the Middle With You”.  It is a great scene and as far as torture goes, Tarantino builds up the tension between an alternation of long shots, medium shots, close ups of objects, like the razor that will cut off the cop’s ear, the radio that will play the music that is a counterpoint to the terrifying scene unfolding, and finally, the surprise end of the scene which I will not divulge.

While the present narrative plays out, it is intercut with flashbacks informing us how the members of the team met and revealing how the undercover cop got on the crew.  Tarantino’s use of flashbacks intercut with the present is perhaps the most clever part of his narrative trope.  Instead of a linear story, we start before the robbery, jump to the aftermath of the robbery, jump back to the past as the crew is formed, jump to the present, etc.  This jars the viewer which in turn places them in a position of slight confusion as to where they are in the story, what’s happening, and who is responsible for the narrative itself.  Perhaps it is because we get multiple POVs that we feel as alienated as some of the cons.

This alienation also plays a key role in the final scene, in the shootout involving Mr. White, Nice Guy Eddie (Chris Penn) and Joe Cabot (Lawrence Tierney).   I believe, what made this film such a sensation, besides the torture scene involving Mr. Blonde and the cop, is the fact that they all shoot each other and even our undercover cop is killed.  Usually someone survives.  In this case, from what we can tell, the obnoxious Mr. Pink is the sole survivor but he gets picked up by the police as he makes his escape (from what we hear offscreen).  So, in one sense, Mr. Orange has accomplished his goal.  All the bad guys are caught.  He just didn’t live to see it.  And herein lies my problem, I don’t actually feel bad that Mr. Orange has been killed.  Instead, the triple shooting death that comes as a result of Joe shooting Mr. Orange, trumps Mr. Orange’s death, as an individual.  But then again, this movie was about a dysfunctional group of gangsters working together and it ended  as a dysfunctional group of gangsters dying together.  I just believe the whole thing would have been more poignant if there had been some humanity.  Somewhere.  When I finish watching a film and don’t care that they all died, I start to question why.  And it goes back to character, or lack of character, in the film.  Yes, these characters were ‘characters’ but they weren’t human.  Tony Soprano is human.  That’s the difference between a great character and a bunch of mediocre ones that stand alone for shock value.

Watch my Vlog Review on YouTube.